
"Anesthesia, STAT to Unit Five. Anesthesia to Unit Five, STAT."
I bolted up the stairs and then down a long corridor. The room I needed to find was of course the very last one. Just outside the doorway a woman with greying hair stood weeping, and beside her a younger woman was wringing her hands. Beyond them I saw a male patient lying on the bed. A man in a white coat was performing chest compressions. Another man in a white coat stood at the foot of the bed managing the code. There were a respiratory therapist and two nurses assisting, one to record data, another to fetch and push drugs.
The man at the foot of the bed turned and saw me. "Good, the anesthesiologist is here."
He turned to the two frightened, distraught women in the doorway.
"If we're going to continue with the resuscitation, we need to get a breathing tube in. May we proceed?"
The bewildered women turned to each other. "What? Um, I don't know. I don't think he wanted that," said one of them.
"Yes he did - he said we should do everything," said the other.
"But he told me he didn't want to linger on machines..."
Meanwhile, the doctor and nurses in the room were trying to get our attention. "We need to intubate him now."
The first doctor turned to the women once again.
"I don't know, I don't know!" they said, with panic in their eyes and voices.
I started preparing equipment and drugs, but eventually, the family decided against continuing the resuscitation. They sent me away. The other doctors and nurses stopped what they were doing. The patient died.
***
It's because of situations like this that I cannot believe, absolutely cannot BELIEVE, that anyone, solely for political
scare-mongering, should be so
misleading and ludicrous as to attack the idea of end-of-life counseling - especially considering the fact that the proposed counseling is VOLUNTARY.
Frankly, as a physician I actually think it SHOULD be mandatory rather than voluntary. Too few families are prepared for their loved ones' impending deaths - the decisions that have to be made, the ability to respect their loved ones wishes. How can families make sound decisions if they are completely uninformed of the choices they have?
The House bill requires "an explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available." It is insulting to the public's intelligence to try to propagate the idea that the government is trying to end people's lives sooner simply by proposing the means by which to educate the public about their options and to encourage dialogue both among family members and between health care providers and families. How can doctors and nurses provide the care and service patients want if patients haven't reflected on their own wishes and made them known?
I mean, are people like Palin,
Grassley, and Isakson
really that obtuse, or are they just faking it, twisting the truth or downright
making stuff up, for ideologic reasons?
Health care is ALREADY rationed. It's called being DENIED health insurance claims for things like cancer surgery, denied coverage because of a "preexisting condition," and the like. While we might complain about the details and be concerned about the funding, we really shouldn't be complaining about
the idea of making health care more AVAILABLE.